![]() ![]() In all, 63% of the campaign stories focused on political and tactical aspects of the campaign. Meanwhile, the tone of coverage of the two party front runners, New York Senator Hillary Clinton and former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, was virtually identical, and more negative than positive, according to the study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. Arizona Senator John McCain received the most negative coverage-much worse than his main GOP rivals. Democrat Barack Obama, the junior Senator from Illinois, enjoyed by far the most positive treatment of the major candidates during the first five months of the year-followed closely by Fred Thompson, the actor who at the time was only considering running. The press also gave some candidates measurably more favorable coverage than others. In the early months of the 2008 presidential campaign, the media had already winnowed the race to mostly five candidates and offered Americans relatively little information about their records or what they would do if elected, according to a comprehensive new study of the election coverage across the media. Hmm.A study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Although that would have required Madonna to have a budding romance with a ’tweenage boy. There are so many famous names that the question arises: Would this movie have been more enjoyable with the real humans instead of just their voices? Yes. But many of the voices are familiar: Madonna, Jimmy Fallon, Snoop Dogg, David Bowie, Harvey Keitel, Robert De Niro and other famous names provide them. It’s also too frenetically paced and confusing for adults or children. The computer-generated world is visually rich, but short on the droll humor that makes good children’s films bearable for adults. Arthur manages to shrink himself to near-invisibility so he can enter a secret world and search for some gems that will solve all the problems.Īt this point the film becomes computer-generated, and also resembles, at various times, “Honey, I Shrunk the Kids,” “The Sword in the Stone,” “Fraggle Rock” and assorted others. The film begins in the conventional human world of the early 1960s, where Arthur (Freddie Highmore) and his grandmother (Mia Farrow) have troubles galore: Grandpa went missing a few years ago, and developers are on the verge of taking over the family homestead. The press packet for “Arthur,” a children’s film directed by Luc Besson, includes lots of tidbits on the magic that enabled the merging of live actors and a computer-generated world, but who can really keep track of this technogoo anymore, or get excited about it? The real question isn’t how these hybrid movies are made, but why. In the latest wowzer merging of the real and the fabricated, “Arthur and the Invisibles” takes actual human actors and, through a complex process involving Slim-Fast and a Maytag dryer, shrinks them to the size of bacteria so they can interact with the microscopic beings who live in your backyard along with Rick Moranis and his family. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |